Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 02:16
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
John Harbaugh on Aaron Rodgers: I don’t have a reaction, just respect - NBC Sports
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
MSU Taps J Batt As Next Director of Athletics - Michigan State University Athletics
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
Genetic variant tied to doubled dementia risk for older men - The Washington Post
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
How can a person develop advanced brain power?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
US researchers solve tokamak plasma mystery with elusive ‘voids’ discovery - Interesting Engineering
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Which type of earbuds, wired or wireless, is better for sleep and why?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Why are the democrats keep insisting that there are more than two genders?